General Navigation - Complete ATPL Subject Guide
General Navigation, designated as ATPL Subject 061, forms the foundation of all navigation knowledge required for professional pilots. While modern aviation relies heavily on satellite navigation and sophisticated flight management systems, understanding the fundamental principles of navigation - how we describe position on Earth, how we plan routes, how wind affects our track, how we represent the curved Earth on flat charts - remains essential for competent airmanship. These principles underlie all navigation systems, and pilots who thoroughly understand them can navigate confidently even when electronic systems fail or provide questionable information.
The subject explores concepts humans have developed over centuries to solve the challenge of navigation on a spherical planet, from ancient mariners using celestial observations to modern aviators flying great circle routes optimized by computer systems. The mathematical precision required might seem daunting initially, but these calculations represent practical solutions to real problems every pilot faces - determining how far and in what direction to fly, calculating the effect of wind on the aircraft's path, and converting between different time references. Mastering these concepts provides not just exam success but genuine navigational competence.
The Earth and Coordinate Systems
Understanding navigation begins with understanding the Earth itself - its shape, dimensions, and the coordinate system we use to describe positions on its surface. The Earth approximates an oblate spheroid, slightly flattened at the poles and bulging at the equator due to rotational forces. This deviation from perfect sphericity is small enough that for most aviation purposes we treat Earth as a perfect sphere with defined mean radius, though high-precision calculations for satellite navigation or long-range operations may account for the true ellipsoidal shape.
The geographic coordinate system describes any position on Earth's surface using latitude and longitude, a framework established by the planet's rotation. The axis of rotation defines two fixed points - the North and South Poles - and the plane perpendicular to this axis passing through Earth's center defines the Equator. From these fundamental references, we build the entire coordinate system that enables precise position description.
Latitude and Longitude
Latitude measures angular distance north or south from the Equator, ranging from 0° at the Equator to 90° North at the North Pole and 90° South at the South Pole. Every point along a line of constant latitude forms a small circle parallel to the Equator, called a parallel of latitude. These parallels decrease in circumference as latitude increases, with maximum circumference at the Equator and zero circumference at the poles. Understanding this geometric reality proves essential when considering distances and routes - one degree of longitude represents vastly different ground distances at the Equator versus near the poles.
Longitude measures angular distance east or west from the Prime Meridian, an arbitrarily chosen reference line passing through Greenwich, England. Longitude ranges from 0° at the Prime Meridian to 180° East or West, where the 180° meridians meet on the opposite side of Earth from Greenwich, roughly following the International Date Line through the Pacific Ocean. Every line of constant longitude forms a great circle passing through both poles, called a meridian. Unlike parallels of latitude which vary in length, all meridians have identical length, and the spacing between meridians converges from maximum at the Equator to zero at the poles.
Angular measurements in navigation traditionally use degrees, minutes, and seconds, with 60 minutes per degree and 60 seconds per minute. Modern aviation increasingly uses decimal degrees or degrees and decimal minutes for easier calculation. Converting between formats requires care but follows straightforward arithmetic - 35° 30' equals 35.5 decimal degrees, while 45.25° equals 45° 15'. One minute of latitude always represents one nautical mile distance, a relationship established by definition and providing a convenient measurement unit for aviation and maritime navigation. However, one minute of longitude only equals one nautical mile at the Equator, representing progressively shorter distances as latitude increases according to the cosine of the latitude.
Great Circles and Rhumb Lines
Two fundamental concepts for route planning involve great circles and rhumb lines, representing different philosophies for connecting two points on Earth's surface. A great circle represents the shortest distance between two points on a sphere, formed by the intersection of the sphere with a plane passing through both the points and Earth's center. Every great circle divides Earth into two equal hemispheres, and the Equator and all meridians are great circles. Any other circle on Earth's surface that doesn't pass through the sphere's center is a small circle.
The shortest distance between two points on Earth always follows a great circle arc, making great circle navigation theoretically optimal for minimizing flight distance and thus time and fuel. However, great circles present a practical complication - except when flying along the Equator or along a meridian, a great circle path constantly changes direction relative to true north. If you plotted a great circle route from New York to London on a globe and measured the true course at multiple points along the route, you'd find it changing continuously, making it impractical to follow exactly without constant course adjustments.
Rhumb lines solve this practical problem by maintaining constant true course. A rhumb line spirals toward the pole, crossing each meridian at the same angle. On a Mercator chart projection, rhumb lines appear as straight lines, making them easy to plot and follow. The compromise is that except for routes along the Equator or along meridians, rhumb lines are longer than great circles connecting the same points. The difference is insignificant for short distances but becomes substantial for long-range flights.
Modern aviation typically uses a hybrid approach - the great circle route is calculated and divided into segments of perhaps 5-10 degrees of longitude, and straight segments (rhumb lines) connect points along the great circle at these intervals. This creates a stepped approximation of the great circle that captures most of the distance benefit while requiring only periodic small course changes rather than continuous adjustment. Flight management systems calculate these routes automatically, but understanding the underlying geometry enables pilots to verify that computed routes make sense.
Charts and Map Projections
Representing Earth's curved surface on flat paper or electronic displays requires mathematical projections that inevitably introduce distortions. No projection can perfectly preserve all properties - shape, area, distance, and direction - simultaneously. Understanding common projections used in aviation, their characteristics, and their limitations enables proper chart interpretation and navigation planning.
Mercator Projection
The Mercator projection, developed by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569, became standard for maritime and later aeronautical charts due to one crucial property - all rhumb lines appear as straight lines. This property, called conformality, makes Mercator charts extraordinarily practical for navigation using compass headings. Draw a straight line between departure and destination, measure its angle relative to meridians, and you have a constant magnetic course (after applying variation) that will take you from origin to destination.
Mercator achieves conformality through progressive expansion of the chart as latitude increases, stretching east-west distances to match the north-south expansion necessary to maintain shape. At the Equator, Mercator projection introduces minimal distortion. However, distortion increases rapidly with latitude - Greenland appears larger than South America on Mercator charts, despite South America actually being eight times larger. This area distortion makes Mercator unsuitable for high latitudes, typically limiting its use to within 70° or 80° of the Equator.
The practical consequence for pilots is that distances measured on Mercator charts require correction for latitude, typically by measuring against the latitude scale at the chart's midpoint latitude. Additionally, great circle routes plotted on Mercator charts appear as curves bulging toward the pole, potentially misleading pilots into thinking direct rhumb line routes (straight lines on the chart) represent shortest distances. For routes crossing significant longitude and at substantial latitudes, the great circle may save considerable distance despite appearing longer on Mercator projection.
Lambert Conformal Conic Projection
Lambert Conformal Conic projection addresses Mercator's high-latitude limitations while retaining conformality. This projection imagines a cone intersecting the Earth at two standard parallels, typically selected to bracket the region of interest. The cone is then unwrapped into a flat surface, creating a chart where meridians appear as straight lines converging toward the pole, and parallels appear as concentric arcs.
Between the two standard parallels, Lambert projection introduces minimal distortion, making it ideal for mid-latitude regions. Shape is well preserved (conformal property), and scale distortion remains small within reasonable distance from the standard parallels. Great circles appear as curves that are nearly straight, and rhumb lines appear as curves that are also nearly straight, with the difference between them being small for typical route distances. This makes Lambert projection practical for both great circle and rhumb line navigation.
Aviation charts for continental regions frequently use Lambert projection, particularly for areas like the United States, Europe, and China which lie primarily in mid-latitudes. Terminal area charts, sectional charts, and area navigation charts commonly employ Lambert projection. The converging meridians mean that measuring course requires careful use of the meridian nearest the measurement location, as true north direction varies across the chart. The convergence angle, called convergency, can be calculated and must be considered when plotting courses spanning significant longitude changes.
Polar Stereographic Projection
For polar regions above 80° latitude, Polar Stereographic projection provides optimal characteristics. This projection imagines placing a flat plane tangent to Earth at one pole, then projecting the polar region onto this plane. Meridians appear as straight lines radiating from the pole, and parallels appear as concentric circles around the pole.
Polar stereographic is conformal like Mercator and Lambert, preserving shapes. Great circles through the pole or near it appear nearly straight, facilitating polar navigation. The projection works well for polar routes that overfly or pass near the North Pole, increasingly common for flights between North America and Asia. Grid navigation, using a grid oriented relative to a reference meridian rather than true north, often simplifies polar navigation where true north becomes less meaningful as you approach the pole where all meridians converge.
Position Determination and Dead Reckoning
Navigation fundamentally requires determining your current position, predicting future position, and adjusting course as needed to reach your destination. Multiple techniques exist for position determination, each with advantages and limitations. Dead reckoning, the most basic technique, uses known starting position, heading, speed, and time to calculate current position without external references.
The term "dead reckoning" likely derives from "deduced reckoning," as position is deduced from basic parameters. From a known position, you fly a specific heading at a specific speed for a measured time, allowing calculation of distance traveled and thus predicted position. Dead reckoning forms the foundation of all navigation - even sophisticated systems like GPS ultimately perform a form of dead reckoning, calculating position from measured distances and angles to satellites.
Wind Effects and the Navigation Triangle
Aircraft fly through air masses that are themselves moving relative to Earth's surface, and this wind profoundly affects navigation. The aircraft's heading and true airspeed determine its motion through the air mass, but the air mass's wind velocity combines with this to determine the aircraft's track and groundspeed over Earth's surface. Understanding and calculating this relationship, often called the wind triangle or navigation triangle, represents essential navigation skill.
The navigation triangle comprises three velocity vectors. True airspeed vector, directed along the aircraft heading, represents the aircraft's motion through the air. Wind velocity vector represents the air mass motion relative to the ground, described by wind direction (where the wind comes from) and wind speed. Groundspeed vector, called the track made good, represents the aircraft's actual motion over the ground, combining the true airspeed and wind vectors.
When wind blows from directly ahead (headwind), groundspeed decreases below true airspeed by the wind speed. When wind blows from directly behind (tailwind), groundspeed increases above true airspeed. Crosswinds cause the aircraft to drift sideways relative to intended track. To maintain desired track in crosswind conditions, pilots must apply wind correction angle, intentionally heading partially into the wind so that the combined effect of airspeed and wind produces the desired ground track.
Calculating these relationships requires vector mathematics, traditionally accomplished using manual plotting on navigation computers or mathematical calculation. Modern flight management systems perform these calculations continuously, updating groundspeed and track based on measured winds. However, understanding the underlying principles enables pilots to check whether computed values make sense and to perform reasonable estimates mentally when needed.
Calculating Wind Correction Angle and Groundspeed
The wind triangle can be solved for any of its components given the others. Most commonly in flight planning, you know the desired track, true airspeed, and forecast wind, and you need to determine the required heading and expected groundspeed. In flight, you might measure actual track and groundspeed with known heading and airspeed, allowing calculation of actual wind for comparison with forecasts.
The maximum drift angle, the angle between heading and track when flying perpendicular to the wind, can be approximated using the relationship drift = wind speed / true airspeed × 60. For example, with 40 knots wind and 200 knots true airspeed, maximum drift would be approximately (40/200) × 60 = 12 degrees. When flying at angles other than perpendicular to the wind, actual drift depends on the wind component perpendicular to the desired track.
For small drift angles, which covers most practical aviation situations, wind correction angle approximately equals the drift angle but applied in the opposite direction. To maintain track 360° with a crosswind from the left causing 12° drift, you would fly heading 348° (360° - 12°), heading into the wind enough that the aircraft drifts back onto desired track. For large drift angles or precise calculations, more sophisticated methods or navigation computers provide accuracy.
Groundspeed calculations similarly depend on headwind or tailwind components. The headwind component, portion of wind velocity opposing forward motion, equals wind speed × cosine of angle between wind direction and aircraft heading. Groundspeed then equals true airspeed minus headwind component. Crosswind components similarly use sine of the angle between wind direction and heading. These trigonometric relationships enable precise calculation, though rough mental estimates often suffice for operational purposes.
Time Systems and Calculations
Aviation operations span time zones and require precise time coordination between pilots, controllers, dispatchers, and other parties who may be located thousands of miles apart. Multiple time systems serve different purposes, and pilots must fluently convert between them and calculate time-based problems involving flight duration, fuel consumption, and arrival predictions.
UTC and Local Time
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), formerly called Greenwich Mean Time, provides aviation's standard time reference. UTC remains constant worldwide, unaffected by time zones or daylight saving adjustments, enabling unambiguous communication about times. A scheduled departure time of 1430 UTC means the same time for pilots in New York, London, Tokyo, or Sydney, eliminating confusion about which local time zone applies.
UTC relates to solar time at the Prime Meridian (0° longitude), though precise UTC is maintained by atomic clocks and may diverge slightly from solar time. For aviation purposes, UTC can be considered the local mean time at Greenwich, England. Converting between UTC and local time requires knowing the time zone, typically expressed as hours offset from UTC. Eastern Standard Time (EST) is UTC-5, meaning local time is 5 hours behind UTC. When it's 1500 UTC, EST is 1000 local. Pacific Standard Time (PST) is UTC-8, three hours behind EST.
Daylight Saving Time complicates conversions by shifting local time forward one hour during summer months, though UTC remains unchanged. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) is UTC-4, Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) is UTC-7. International operations require careful attention to whether destinations observe daylight saving time, when transitions occur, and what the current offset is. Time zones aren't strictly based on longitude - political boundaries create irregular zone shapes, and some regions use unusual offsets like 30-minute or 45-minute deviations from whole hours.
Flight Time Calculations
Flight planning requires calculating departure and arrival times, flight duration, and fuel requirements. The basic relationship is departure time + flight time = arrival time, but careful attention to time zones and date changes prevents errors. Crossing the International Date Line requires adding or subtracting a day - westbound crossings (to earlier time zones) advance the calendar date, while eastbound crossings retreat to the previous calendar date.
Long-range flight planning often works entirely in UTC to avoid time zone confusion, converting to local time only for operations at specific airports where local time coordination is needed. Calculating elapsed time between two UTC times requires careful handling of midnight boundaries - if departure is 2300 UTC and arrival is 0200 UTC, elapsed time is 3 hours, not negative 21 hours. Adding 24 hours to the arrival time before subtraction solves this: 0200 + 2400 = 2600, then 2600 - 2300 = 0300 hours, or 3 hours.
Fuel calculations often use fuel flow rates in kilograms or pounds per hour, requiring conversion between time and fuel quantities. If an aircraft burns 3,000 kg/hr and a flight leg requires 2.5 hours, fuel required is 3,000 × 2.5 = 7,500 kg. Reserve fuel calculations may require holding time converted to fuel quantity - 30 minutes final reserve at 2,500 kg/hr holding consumption equals 1,250 kg reserve fuel. These calculations must account for the fact that fuel flow decreases as aircraft weight decreases during flight due to fuel burn, though simplified calculations often use average flow rates for reasonable approximation.
Chart Plotting and Measurement
Using navigation charts effectively requires skills in measuring directions, distances, and plotting positions. Traditional paper charts and even electronic charts displayed on tablets or cockpit displays require pilots to measure courses, plot fixes, and determine positions using chart symbology and scales.
Measuring true course on a chart requires using a meridian or true north indicator as reference, accounting for convergency on Lambert projections where meridians aren't parallel. A plotter or protractor aligned with a meridian gives true course, which must then be corrected for magnetic variation to determine magnetic course and ultimately compass course after applying compass deviation. On Mercator charts, meridians are parallel, simplifying course measurement. On Lambert charts, the convergency angle must be considered when measuring courses far from the reference meridian.
Distance measurement uses the chart's scale, which varies by projection type. On Mercator charts, the latitude scale provides accurate distance measurement, with one minute of latitude always equaling one nautical mile. Measuring against the midpoint latitude of the route segment gives acceptable accuracy. On Lambert charts with minimal scale distortion, the graphic distance scale provides direct measurement. For long routes, dividing the route into segments and measuring each separately, then summing the results, provides better accuracy than measuring the entire route at once.
Position plotting requires determining latitude and longitude corresponding to chart positions. Precise plotting uses gridlines and interpolation between marked parallels and meridians. Approximate positions might be estimated by visual reference to nearby geographic features, adequate for general orientation but insufficient for precise navigation. When plotting fixes from radio navigation aids, bearings are drawn from the aids through the chart, and position is determined where the bearings intersect. Multiple bearing lines improve accuracy and provide cross-check against errors.
Practical Navigation Applications
While much modern navigation is performed by flight management systems, understanding general navigation principles enables pilots to verify system outputs, detect errors, and navigate competently when systems fail or provide questionable information. Mental navigation, maintaining approximate awareness of position through basic dead reckoning and landmark recognition, provides continuous cross-check against electronic navigation.
Pilots should habitually maintain awareness of approximate heading, groundspeed, and elapsed time from last known position, allowing rough position estimates at any time. If the flight management system suddenly displays position 50 miles away from where dead reckoning suggests you should be, that discrepancy warrants investigation before trusting either position. Perhaps a waypoint was incorrectly entered, a GPS failure occurred, or your dead reckoning assumptions were wrong - but the discrepancy itself signals something requiring attention.
Fuel calculations benefit from navigation knowledge. If forecast winds predicted 90-knot tailwind but actual groundspeed suggests only 60-knot tailwind, remaining fuel predictions based on forecast winds will be optimistic. Recalculating expected arrival fuel with actual winds provides more accurate planning. Similarly, if forecast headwind was 40 knots but actual proves to be 60 knots, fuel consumption will exceed plan, possibly requiring speed reduction, altitude change, or diversion to a closer alternate.
EASA Learning Objectives
The EASA syllabus for General Navigation encompasses extensive content including Earth's shape and dimensions, coordinate systems, chart projections and their properties, great circle and rhumb line navigation, position determination methods, dead reckoning, wind triangle calculations, time systems and conversions, and chart plotting techniques. Candidates must demonstrate ability to solve navigation problems using multiple methods, interpret and use various chart types, calculate wind effects on track and groundspeed, convert between time systems, and understand fundamental navigation concepts.
Exam questions test both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving ability. You must recognize chart projection types and their characteristics, solve wind triangle problems for heading and groundspeed, calculate times and distances for flight planning, convert between coordinate formats, and apply navigation principles to operational scenarios. The mathematics involved is not advanced but requires careful attention to detail, proper unit conversions, and logical problem-solving approaches.
Related Articles:
- Radio Navigation - ATPL Subject 062 [?]
- Flight Planning - ATPL Subject 033
- Meteorology - ATPL Subject 050
- Instrumentation - ATPL Subject 022